Intellectual Property in Construction Law: Carlisle Homes v Tick Homes

Intellectual property (IP) is a key asset in today’s construction industry, helping businesses safeguard their competitive edge in an increasingly tech-driven landscape. As construction evolves with the introduction of high-tech products, materials, and digital platforms, understanding how to protect new and innovative ideas is crucial. This blog post will look at the Federal Court Case Carlisle Homes Pty Ltd v Tick Homes Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 973 (‘Carlisle Homes’) as it demonstrates the critical role of copyright in the construction sector.

Katie Gold4 March 2025intellectual property, Construction Law, chris moshidis, urban lawyers, carlisle homes, tick homes, ip, construction, federal court, ip rights, dispute resolution

High Court Decision on Non-Delegable Duty of Care in Construction Law

In a pivotal decision for the construction industry, the High Court has ruled that the statutory duty of care owed by developers and head contractors under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) (DBPA) is non-delegable and not apportionable. This ruling has significant implications for developers, contractors, and their insurers.

Katie Gold11 February 2025chris moshidis, urban, DBPA, Civil Liability Act 2002 NSW, Pafburn, Non-Delegable Duty of Care, Construction Law

Blog